ALERTAUDIT · CASE FILE REPORT AA-2026-001 (PILOT SAMPLE) WINDOW 2026-04-20 → 2026-07-20 · 90 DAYS ISSUED 2026-07-21 · REV 3.1 (changelog)

Audit of “Binance Killers”

The public feed of Telegram channel Binance Killers (~319,000 subscribers) — every post in the window collected, classified, and scored against real exchange data. Every quote and signal below links to its original public post, so any line can be verified in one click.

Its two real public calls both won — and of every advertised profit figure, from “+107%” to “almost 1800% a month”, the only one that maps to a public call peaks at +117% on exchange data against a claimed +300%. The rest cannot be checked at all.

Public signals
Pass

2 of 2 advance calls hit Target 1 and ran to Target 5 — while BTC fell 11.6%. Sample of two: 95% CI 34–100%.

Marketing claims
Unverifiable

39 profit/accuracy posts. Of 22 coin-specific claims, 21 have no public advance call — the one that does claims +300% against a +117% public peak.

Feed quality
0.9% signal

2 unique signals (+6 re-posts) in 859 posts. The rest: 352 commentaries, 39 profit claims, 460 promos & misc.

859
public posts in 90 days
2
unique advance signals
39
posts claiming profits or accuracy
0/22
claims substantiated by the public feed
Exhibit A · The feed

859 posts. Two of them were signals.

859 public posts in 90 days — classified every post in the window, one bar per category
Advance signals — 2 unique (+6 reposts)8Profit claims & accuracy ads39Market commentary (untradeable)352Promos & misc460

Every post in the window, classified. An advance signal = instrument + direction + entry + posted before the move. Everything else cannot be traded and cannot be scored.

Exhibit B · The two real signals

Credit where due: both public calls worked.

Signal 1 — ZIG longposted 2026-05-04 13:12 UTC · Bybit spot, 1h closes
0.031810.040340.048860.05739May 04May 30Jun 25Jul 20 TP1 ✓TP3 ✓TP4 ✓TP5 ✓TP6SL — never touched ENTRY 0.02812
Posted2026-05-04 13:12 UTC
Entry (“below 0.03”)filled 0.02812
Target 1 (+13.8%)hit 05-10, stop untouched
Best target hit5 of 9 (TP5 = +70.7%)
Peak / window end+117.2% high · +50.4% mark

Prior public ZIG calls, for context: this is at least the fourth public ZIG entry call since August 2025 — entry 0.08–0.112 (Aug 2025), below 0.06 (Jan 2026), below 0.04 (Mar 2026), then this signal's below 0.03 — each re-issue roughly 25–30% under the last. Scored from its own timestamp, this call won; a reader who bought inside the Aug 2025 zone holds −47% to −62% at this window's end (0.0423). The signal was also re-posted four times in-window (May 10, 13, 14, 21) — price was already above the entry zone by the first re-post.

Signal 2 — BULLA longposted 2026-07-17 12:25 UTC · Binance futures, 1h closes
0.0073090.00870.010090.01148Jul 17Jul 18Jul 19Jul 20 TP1 ✓TP3 ✓TP4 ✓TP5 ✓TP6SL — never touched ENTRY 0.008605
Posted2026-07-17 12:25 UTC
Entry (“below 0.0089”)filled 0.008605
Target 1 (+5.75%)hit in 5 hours
Best target hit5 of 8 (TP5 = +27.8%)
Peak / window end+44.8% high · +34.0% mark (3 days old — not final)

The $10K test: $10,978 exiting each at Target 1, or $14,220 riding the ladder to window end — against $8,840 just holding BTC. Both readings beat the market. Both rest on exactly two trades — a 2/2 hit rate carries a 95% confidence interval of 34% to 100%. Two wins is consistent with skill and with luck.

Run this audit on your channel — $19 48-hour turnaround · full refund if your alerts can't be parsed
Exhibit C · Claims vs. public record

39 posts claim profits. We looked for the trades.

For every coin-specific profit claim in the window, we searched the channel's entire public history — 19,451 posts back to December 2020 — for the advance call it refers to:

DateCoinClaim (verbatim)Public advance call
2026-04-24$CHZ“+107% profit”NONE FOUND
2026-04-28$XTZ“88% profit”NONE FOUND
2026-05-05$ARB“ARB. Entered at $0.09. Hit +236.1%”NONE FOUND
2026-05-05$CHZ“CHZ hit +107.1%”NONE FOUND
2026-05-05$TAO“TAO hit +102%”NONE FOUND
2026-05-09$ICP“1225% + total profit for May”NONE FOUND
2026-05-29$WLD“🔥 44.2% Profit (5x) 🔥”NONE FOUND
2026-06-03$NEAR“NEAR. Entered at $1.28. Hit +278.2%”NONE FOUND
2026-06-03$HYPE“HYPE +250%”NONE FOUND
2026-06-03$SUI“SUI +224%”NONE FOUND
2026-06-03$FET“FET +200%”NONE FOUND
2026-06-03$ZIG“ZIG (GEM Signal) +300%”call #19864 · PEAK +117%
2026-07-06$SKY“We called this bounce early and we're currently sitting on a 77% profit (5x) fro…”NONE FOUND
2026-07-07$SOL“We're currently sitting on 108% profit (5x) from this call, and price has alread…”NONE FOUND
2026-07-08$UNI“We're sitting on 227% profit (5x) from this call, with just the final target lef…”NONE FOUND
2026-07-10$UNI“UNI. Entered at $2.47. Hit +227.3%”NONE FOUND
2026-07-10$TAO“TAO hit +175%”NONE FOUND
2026-07-10$ASTER“ASTER hit +158.3%”NONE FOUND
2026-07-10$AERO“AERO hit +126.3%”NONE FOUND
2026-07-10$SOL“SOL hit +107.7%”NONE FOUND
2026-07-15$LINK“We're sitting on 24% profit with the first target already touched, and price jus…”NONE FOUND
2026-07-19$LINK“✔ $LINK up 50% from our entry ✔”NONE FOUND
Finding: the channel's entire public history — 19,451 posts since December 2020 — contains just 13 advance-call posts: four for ZIG, three for BULLA (incl. re-posts), four for BTC (2025) and two for XVG (2025). Of the 22 coin-specific claims, 21 refer to trades with no public entry call anywhere in that history — attributed to a private VIP service — and can be neither substantiated nor refuted, like the month totals of “770%”, “1035%”, “1225%” and “almost 1800%”. The single claim that does map to a public call — “ZIG (GEM Signal) +300%” (#20172, referring to signal #19864) — is contradicted by exchange data: the public price path peaked at +117% from the audited fill (Bybit high 0.06107); +300% would require 0.1125, a price ZIG never traded in the window. A track record that cannot be checked is not a track record.
Exhibit D · The language

Claims built to be unfalsifiable.

“Zero losses. Not a single one. Every signal. Every setup. Still green.” Post #19744 · 2026-04-21
“May signals alone. Almost 1800% profit. Not counting March. Not counting April.” Post #20124 · 2026-05-29
“✅ 92%+ Historical Accuracy” Recurring advertisement · 5 appearances in window · e.g. post #19846

Structural flags on the signals themselves: entry zones with no lower bound (“below 0.03”) and target ladders ending in “OPEN” — which makes any per-signal “total profit” figure non-computable even in principle.

Right of reply: Binance Killers — or anyone — may dispute any line of this report at audit@alertaudit.io. Every factual claim above links to its source; demonstrated factual errors are corrected within 48 hours with a visible changelog. Nothing here alleges wrongdoing — it documents what the public record does and does not support.
Reading this report

What 90 days can and cannot prove.

The data supports

  • The public feed is 0.5% actionable signal by volume.
  • Both real public calls won, in a falling market.
  • Advertised accuracy figures have no public evidence behind them — and the one checkable profit claim is contradicted by exchange data.
  • Only 13 posts in the channel's entire public history (19,451 posts since Dec 2020) contain an advance call.
  • 4.5% of all posts are performance marketing.

The data cannot tell you

  • Whether the private VIP record is real — nobody outside can check it.
  • Whether 2/2 is skill or luck (CI: 34–100%).
  • How the channel performs in other market regimes.

If you are paying for the VIP tier on the strength of the advertised numbers, you are paying for figures the public record cannot confirm. That is this audit's verdict.

Methodology — identical in every report
  1. Source material. Every public post in the window collected and counted. Nothing excluded.
  2. Scoring rule. A post is a scoreable advance signal if it names an instrument, a direction, an entry level, and was posted before the move it describes. Exits follow the signal's own targets/stop.
  3. Price data. 1-hour exchange OHLC from the post's timestamp — no look-ahead. Entry rule: first 1h open after the post if inside the stated zone, else first touch of the zone edge.
  4. Conservative tie-break. A candle touching both target and stop counts the stop first.
  5. The $10K test. Equal split across all scoreable signals, no leverage. Benchmark: BTC buy-and-hold, same window.
  6. Uncertainty. Hit rates carry Wilson 95% confidence intervals. Small samples are stated, not hidden.
  7. Independence. No relationship with any signal provider. Educational statistical analysis, not financial advice.
Appendix A — the scoreable signals, verbatim

Post #19864 · 2026-05-04 13:12 UTC — “GEM SIGNAL: $ZIG — Exchanges: ByBit, Bitget, MEXC, Gate … ENTRY: Below 0.03 · TARGETS: 0.032 – 0.034 – 0.037 – 0.041 – 0.048 – 0.064 – 0.088 – 0.104 – 0.128 – OPEN · SL: Below 0.024” (re-posted #19949, #19977, #19989, #20050)

Post #20580 · 2026-07-17 12:25 UTC (reposted #20597, #20600) — “SIGNAL ID #2183 · COIN: $BULLA/USDT (2-5x) · Direction: LONG (Binance Futures) · ENTRY: Below 0.0089 · TARGETS: 0.0091 – 0.0093 – 0.0096 – 0.01 – 0.011 – 0.0125 – 0.0145 – 0.017 – OPEN · STOP LOSS: Below 0.0061 · ‘Same pattern as other coins that pumped 10-20x’”

A customer report includes the full 859-post census with per-post classification.

Appendix B — data sources & parameters
  • Bybit spot ZIGUSDT 1h OHLC (1,858 candles); Binance futures BULLAUSDT 1h OHLC (83 candles).
  • Cross-check: Gate.io ZIG_USDT daily close vs Bybit, 2026-05-10 — deviation 0.27%, within tolerance.
  • Benchmark: Bybit BTCUSDT daily, 2026-04-20 open 73,803 → 2026-07-20 close 65,258 (−11.6%).
  • Telegram's public preview truncates 8 long posts in the window; each is classified by its visible text. The four ZIG re-posts are matched to signal #19864 by identical visible signal text.
  • Full-history check (Rev 3): all 19,451 public posts (2020-12-15 → 2026-07-21) scanned; 13 contain a visible advance call — #17358, #18554, #19233, #19864 (ZIG), #20580, #20597, #20600 (BULLA), #16662, #16663, #17342, #17343 (BTC, 2025), #17937, #17995 (XVG, 2025). 1,495 history posts are preview-truncated and matched on visible text.
  • Confidence intervals: Wilson score, 95%.
Changelog
  • Rev 3.1 — 2026-07-22. Clarity: the signal fact rows previously combined “best target hit” with the window-end mark in one cell, which read as if the calls peaked at the mark value. Now split: best target hit (with its own return), peak high, and window-end mark shown separately (ZIG: TP5 = +70.7%, peak +117.2%, mark +50.4% · BULLA: TP5 = +27.8%, peak +44.8%, mark +34.0%). No scoring changed.
  • Rev 3 — 2026-07-21. Reader-prompted extension of the claims check from the 90-day window to the channel's entire public history (19,451 posts since 2020-12-15). Result: 13 advance-call posts exist in the full history (4 ZIG, 3 BULLA, 4 BTC in 2025, 2 XVG in 2025); every “NONE FOUND” row is confirmed at full-history scope. Methodology and Appendix B updated; no verdict or number in the claims table changed.
  • Rev 2 — 2026-07-21. Reader-prompted re-audit of the ZIG signal's history. Corrections: (a) four in-window re-posts of signal #19864 were truncated by Telegram's public preview and misclassified — advance-signal posts 4 → 8 (unique signals unchanged at 2); (b) three monthly PNL posts (#19876, #20172, #20509) added to the claims inventory — claim posts 36 → 39, coin-specific claims 9 → 22; (c) the one claim that maps to a public call — “ZIG (GEM Signal) +300%” — added with its exchange-data ceiling of +117% from the audited fill; (d) prior public ZIG entry calls (Aug 2025, Jan 2026, Mar 2026) disclosed as context in Exhibit B; (e) BTC benchmark updated to the settled 2026-07-20 daily close (−11.8% → −11.6%).
  • Rev 1 — 2026-07-21. Initial publication.